Hey,
For some crazy reason, I wasn't thinking about having to re-create the
newborn module in the new FD. However, we'll need to do that. This is not
as pressing as re-making the household module if everyone is okay with
keeping .9HQ up and running the migration scripts.
The newborn module is different from the other modules currently deployed in
Dodoma in that it uses images and audio.
Amelia - do you know if there any other special technical requirements of
the form?
Anton - just to verify, these features are currently supported in the FD,
right? Is there a timeline for this? I realize this was part of the
"priority setting" neal was bringing up. So, I guess I'm just saying that
we do have a need for some more multimedia support if the FD doesn't support
that stuff currently.
Thanks,
Nick
Nick P. Amland
CommCare Field Fellow
Dimagi, Inc.
Dodoma, Tanzania
Google Voice: 253.642.7790
TZ Mobile: +255 762 740 996
Email: namland@dimagi.com namland08@gmail.com
···
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Nick Amland wrote:Okay, cool.
I've just started doing exactly that - creating all of the questions with
the text, first. I'll let you and Anton know if any problems arise with the
other functionality.Thanks,
nickNick P. Amland
CommCare Field Fellow
Dimagi, Inc.
Dodoma, Tanzania
Google Voice: 253.642.7790
TZ Mobile: +255 762 740 996
Email: namland@dimagi.com namland08@gmail.comOn Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Clayton Sims csims@dimagi.com wrote:
Nick,
Agreed. I think that realistically if there's a rush to any specific
deadline we can get the forms made very quickly, but it would be very good
to know whether the Form Designer can handle this use case today, since
other than the bug anton is fixing we think that it can.Please try and get as far as you can defining the form in th FD and let us
know how much of it seems possible. Even just getting the questions and text
in place will definitely make things much easier going forward if we do need
to do them by hand.-Clayton
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Nick Amland namland@dimagi.com wrote:
Sounds good. Ideally, I was trying to have everything built and then
release the new build on Wednesday (4/6). This gives me Thursday to test
the new application on the phone. Then Friday for any last second
adjustments and/or bug fixes. We would like to start training on the
verification process on Monday the 11th, so I can be involved. (Last
projection for my departure for Moz is the 18th).But this just doesn't seem realistic to me. If I run into any bumps in
the FD (even with Anton fixing them quickly after I spot them), that could
potentially set me back a day given the time difference.Regardless, seems worth it to give it a shot and let's see what happens.
It'll be great test of the FD. The nice thing here is that we can dictate
the timeline here so no real harm caused by a slipped deadline.Thanks,
NickNick P. Amland
CommCare Field Fellow
Dimagi, Inc.
Dodoma, Tanzania
Google Voice: 253.642.7790
Email: namland@dimagi.com namland08@gmail.comOn Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 8:03 PM, neal lesh nlesh@dimagi.com wrote:
super & thanks.
nick—sound good to you? i think it’s worth you redoing the forms from
scratch if that will make it work via the FD in our time frame.n
From: Anton de Winter [mailto:adewinter@dimagi.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 11:35 AM
To: Rowena Luk
Cc: Clayton Sims; neal lesh; Amelia Sagoff; droberts; namland;
Jonathan Jackson; Cory Zue
Subject: Re: dodoma forms, FD prioritiesYep, that about sums it up I think. As always, please feel free to
contact me directly or create a ticket if you run into any sort of issues
when attempting to design a new form. If it's high priority I can easily
retask and get on it so that there's a fast turn around time.Re: the bugfix, the fix will be deployed later today. I was out this
morning due to illness, but will be back to working this afternoon.Cheers,
Anton
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Rowena Luk rluk@dimagi.com wrote:
agree that getting these forms done is high priority, that we should do
it in form designer, and that it should get done this week. for what it's
worth, anton is now 100% on form designer quality assurance as far as i
know, so even if we come across a few other hiccoughs in the next few days,
we should be able to resolve those quickly.On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Clayton Sims csims@dimagi.com wrote:
Neal,
Couple comments based on our last discussion
These timelines do make a lot more sense to me. The deadline for
Nick's moz trip that I'd heard was June 1st, so April 18th seems much more
pressing. However, other than one bug that Anton is fixing today (adding the
random() calculate,) there are no aspects of the Dodoma forms which we know
of that are not currently capable of being made in the form designer. I
think it would be worth trying to create the forms currently. We can
document anything that is missing.I'm not sure if the future development path came across particularly
clearly here. The two paths of development are:a) Add more complex structures (easier multimedia text addition, dynamic
itemsets, etc) to the form designerb) Extend the form designer's upload capabilities to handle more
structures.(a) would involve new primary development for Derek/Nick to expand what
forms can be created, (b) would involve allowing more people to upload their
forms to CCHQ and still be able to edit them with the GUI form designer.-Clayton
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:14 PM, neal lesh nlesh@dimagi.com wrote:
hey everybody,
I just wanted to sync up on the plan for dodoma and the form designer.
(1) Dodoma & FD
We’re coming up to a bit of a crunch in Dodoma with time pressure due to
Nick’s expected trip to Moz starting around April 18-25th. I see it as
high priority for Nick to be able to deploy the new forms he is working on
next week. And I think we all agree it is also high priority to have Nick
use the form designer to make these forms rather than do them
directly/manually. I think right now the FD isn’t able to support the form
design he needs.I’m not sure how to weigh these against each other and if you all think
that the FD will soon be able to support Nick’s needs, then we’ll be all set
but I want to lobby for getting the forms deployed next week even if means
bypassing the FD. I think the main thing is just to have a phone module to
train the CHWs on. Nick can clarify. But I think we can do that and still
find a way to keep the pressure on FD, no?(2) multimedia support vs. ability to author more sophisticated forms
Amelia mentioned that soon there will be a question of whether to push
on extending the FD to better handle multimedia or for authoring more
sophisticated forms. I have no strong feelings here other than to verify
that the multimedia works well enough for Derek and Nick to use the system
reasonably smoothly (even if a bit clunky or requiring more XML than we’d
like) to make multimedia enabled applications? After that, I’m not sure
which is more important.thanks!
n